A game designer thinks in the players, not in the game itself. The game is a medium to deliver a playful experience.
Every game designer has some extra to bring to the players. It can be a narrative quality or a special eye for the game feel. Maybe a good reading of spaces to design levels, or the special capacity to abstract in systems.
The first important thing is to get to know it with time. The second is that in game design everything is a system. The system thinking is critical.
When we design a game, though, we design for archetypes or personas. We design for some common denominator. And then the game arrives to real people, the Players. And everyone has their singularities.
It arrives with controls, interfaces, sounds, colors, perception load, and things that are experienced on a very personal level. Each one of us is different, so nuance makes all the difference.
What fascinates me about the clear trend of technology right now, not only LLMs, is the possibility of having a personal game designer for every player, somehow.
If we focus on the real job (system thinking with a personal extra approach) there is the chance to instruct a machine to deliver a personal experience.
Is the machine capable of changing the nuance to meet every single player’s needs?
Think simply in a level balance: too hard for Peter, too easy for Molly.
What if it can be adapted to offer the right challenge to everyone?
My feeling right now oscillates between negativity and positivity, don’t take me for a blind enthusiast.
When I read how the copyright has been assaulted to train certain models, I wanted to retire on a mountain and make offline indie games using VIM on Linux.
Still, the possibility of being capable of meeting each one of my player’s tastes is definitely exciting. Because, at the end of the day, that’s my duty as a game designer.
Be First to Comment