Skip to content

Paolo's Blog Posts

Bring the Plug

When we’re working on a new game, it’s very common to spot a lot of problems and point them out when we’re talking with our team. Having an analytical mindset is normal, especially if you’re in a role like a game designer or gameplay developer. You are, by default, forced to analyze everything very specifically, and this can lead to your analysis being extremely detailed.

The impulse can be to immediately flag these issues, especially nowadays on a Slack channel for instance. They are designed to make you talk. You see that a feature doesn’t work and you mention it because you want to make it known. The issue with this is that, especially when you are in a more senior position, it can lead to confusion.

Imagine you are on a boat with others, and you are all rowing towards a specific direction. Suddenly you notice a leak in the boat, and you stop rowing and shout, “Hey guys! The boat is leaking!” Everybody will stop, right? And someone will fix the leak before continuing.

What if, instead, you continue to work and offer a solution? For example, “Joe, you can fix the leak while we all continue to work,” or “Guys, continue to row! I need to fix this using this plug!”

This shows a different problem-solving skill, one that I had to learn the hard way. Don’t just point at a problem without proposing some solution. Be a problem solver, and your team will appreciate that.

Cost of Duty

I was working on my game, Pawtners Case, when suddenly I experienced a surge in my workload. I was looking for funding, in fact, I was paying an outsourcing company mainly for the art and some blueprint implementation in Unreal Engine. I needed money to pay them, and extra help from external funds would have helped a lot.

The game was abandoned, but I still have the code in my repository and on my PC. Now I have more time, and I have to make a choice. I could leave it where it is, forever. Or I can pick it back up and continue its development.

I am writing a book on game design, thanks to Jettelly, and I am using Pawtners Case as a case study for my book. The book will focus on ideation of new games, one of the most overlooked stages in game development—and probably one of the most important, too.

Using my game as a study, I am tempted to seriously resume its development. However, another peak of work for others may come up, in which case I would have to abandon it again. Other opportunities would then be sacrificed in the name of duty.

Everything contributes to my growth as a person and as a professional, so in the grand scheme of things, it doesn’t matter after all. I continue to design games every single day; that’s all that counts. Still, every choice has a trade-off and a weight on my shoulders somehow. And time passes, and I know this won’t be forever.

To land down a vision

More often than not, a game designer’s job is to translate someone else’s vision, be it from a creative director, a product manager, or a client, into a concrete plan.

This means you have to create detailed proposals and present them to the team as if they were your own.

It’s common for a feature that has been proposed, discussed, and approved to be changed by a developer or even your boss just a few weeks later. The original plan is often sacrificed for faster execution.

When this happens, you meet again and discuss what changed, and someone in a senior position makes an executive call. That’s just how it works.

It’s said that Michelangelo used to make fake ‘final touches’ to his works so that his patrons could feel a sense of authorship. I don’t know if the story is true, but it makes perfect sense.

While game design is central to development, it’s an activity that involves the entire team. We, as game designers, are there to facilitate this process. Patience is key.

You want to believe

There are companies that make games and do not believe in game designers. It may be hard to understand what a game designer is capable to do. Also, not all game designers are able to stand out for the craft. I’ve met people like that who transitioned into other roles.

Every game starts with assumptions. They can be interpretations of market insight or straight fingers pointed at the sky to feel the wind. Assumptions are good to start conversations and show security and vision in early stage, but dangerous for the success of a game. There are successful companies that have in their cultural deck “do not believe any assumption”.

Having people specialized in taking those assumptions and supporting the vision holders to land them down and face reality has a value. These people are professional game designers. In fact, in companies the game designers rarely are the creators of a new product. They are facilitators of game design, that is a role shared among the team.

If you know how to code, that’s enough to make a videogame. If you don’t know it, but you have the money to hire a game developer, you can develop a full game. And if you are sure of your assumptions you can improvise the rest and make a game. There are successful cases that started like this, one I have in my mind right now is Vampire Survivors.

But then there is the reality of the market, of the players out there. And then also the nerdiest anti-social coder will need help on game design.

Same discourse is valid for startup that passed to the growth stage. You may have started making scrappy games filled with ads, and you may assume that you know. But you will need game designers to interpret your (shitty) assumptions and land them down. You need professionals if you want to pass to the growth stage or keep there.

Impossible true stories

I watched the splendid documentary on Sandfall and Clare Obscure: Expedition 33 made by the Australian YouTube channel SkillUp.

Apart from the obvious learnings on commitment, passion, vision, and so on, I have found 3 important insight:

1. it’s super important to share what you do also as a side hustle out there. You may never know, maybe posting a couple of fan themes on a lost music forum may lead to meet special people to make special things.

2. a possible strategy for disruptive indie/AA games is to include people who never made a game in their entire life. Especially if you employ them in the parts more near of the final client, the player. Art, music, writing.

3. the best indicator that you are making a hit is in your internal playtests. It is something you feel while you play your build everyday, also one that is bad looking. We make games for others to play, but how can you sell people things you don’t actually like and be successful? If you see that everyone in your team is playing the game for fun, you have it.

Adding new to classics

I watched the new Netflix show produced by SONY Pictures Animation called “KPop Demon Hunters”. I am not in their target audience, also if I love the animation on 2s (a new pose each 2 photograms, instead than 1) launched by “Spider-Man: Into the Spider-verse” and I recognize the rest of visuals. Not surprising, but well made.

What I liked was the lore, also if I am too adult (not old :P) to understand the nuances of K-pop. I like its silliness and the irreverence of the protagonists, reminds me a lot of what I notice in teenagers: struggle to have followers, always be perfect, but also lots of stress and anxiety because of the dark present and no light on the long term.

I love the mixture between classic mythology with modern K-pop, also if I felt something missing on the demon side. Still, a great show to watch. I also liked that the characters (at least the female ones) are not too hypersexualized. I would like to say the same for the boys, but that’s not the case 😛

And, maybe it’s for the 3d, probably for the combat too, I think that from that proof of concept new lores may spark more fresh, for the action adventure games of the future! Recommended.

New Strands

Last week I have started playing Death Stranding (the first chapter, on PS Plus), and yesterday I have also read an interesting interview to the CEO of Supercell on the need for new type of games. I very much agree with that, so I started connecting the dots.

What console and indie games have that mobile still hasn’t get yet is the “useless beauty”. Things that are not designed or implemented for a specific KPI or data goal. Useless beauty is not that useless to me on the long term, also if you cannot see the immediate benefit. It shows our humanity, and prepares the terrain for cultural and trend settings.

Death Stranding is one of the most impactful experiences I am having in the last 10 year, on gaming side. And it contains a lot of things that make me thing “man, that’s weird, why did you put that?”. Actually, one after another. It’s overwhelming, and beautiful, and it doesn’t explain everything.

Also the last experiments from Supercell, which from a numbers perspective still haven’t found the formula, have something like that. They are much less authorial, the result of a team effort, different purpose, but still. I am sure that Kojima too is willing to make something to be remembered forever, but not played maybe. Different goals, but similar philosophies to me.

I don’t know if they will ever manage to create new genres, but to me the road is correct: not everything must have a direct impact on measures, useless beauty is human and players need wonder, not just mechanics.

The ABC of personal branding

Days ago, on a private conversation, a LinkedIn friend of mine told me “you are the best game design influencer that I know”. I am thankful for that comment, also if I don’t consider myself an influencer. I prefer to use the term communicator.

I hold another interesting discussion on “personal branding” which together with that happening made me think… I don’t really believe in “personal branding”, and being an influencer, and stuff like that.

Branding is something manufactured, the risk with thinking in myself as a brand is to start perceive myself as a commodity, somehow.

I believe in ABC: acknowledgement, body of work, and character. I think I work a lot on that, more than branding.

And I worked it CBA:

1. Character building: this is something personal, everyone tackles this in a different ways and I cannot teach anyone how to do that. I can share one of my character built feature: I deliver, no matter what. I don’t say “I cannot do that in such a small time”. Of course, according to the time I can deliver something more or less detailed. But that’s on you that gave me that time, everything is pretty transparent. I wasn’t like that before had to build that. And that is just one thing among multiples.

2. Body of work: you will become better at the things you practice more often, simple as that. Many years ago, I decided to stop focusing on look for a job in games and started just practicing game design, every single day. Also small things, like listening to a podcast and taking notes, sketching my ways of working. Consistently I developed my body of work. Today I see something from my past and it’s so bad that I notice my progress and I am happy. Plus, thanks to these scrappy spreadsheets, today I have my personal way that brings me income.

3. Acknowledgement: this comes only as a consequence of C and B, you need to find your people. Campfires are better than social networks. A campfire is a group of few people, it can be a reddit group or a slack channel. Interact with like minded people, find people to admire and listen listen listen. And send DMs to listen more. On the other end, you need to work on something. And on that point especially nowadays I cannot teach anything, it’s so hard. But I can say that if you have a job and tomorrow lose it, consider the juggler metaphor, from Seth Godin.

Juggler metaphor: manies believe that the secret of a juggler is the catch. Truth is, the secret is the throw!

Consider each job you had and lost not like you failed a catch. You were learning how to throw better, like a juggler! By flipping your point of view on this (very hard, I still hold consequences of that process), you will get more authority over time.

Reworks and crossroads

Hey reader, thank you for being here today too. It’s been a while, I lost an important source of income and rearranged my forces these days. My game Pawtners Case is moving forward but slowly. Briefly speaking

  • I have pitched to a potential investor. They want to see a demo.
  • I sent the pitch to industry friends (if you’re one of them, thank you very much for your feedback again!) and spotted my potential weaknesses
  • I am rearrarging forces and trying to differentiate my business. In fact I cannot rely only on Pawtners Case to stay afloat. I need to find a source of income and also new projects.
  • I am also retaking my programming side, hope to show you something soon.

Good news I am here, healthy and alive. I have my challenges as you do have others for sure, but I am happy! The important thing at crossroards it’s to make a step forward for our rework.

What I learned in the Playable Stories Workshop

Yesterday, I participated in a workshop on how to write for playable stories. It was a workshop oriented to professional game writers, and I am not. Still, I found it very useful in improving my skills in narrative design.

It was divided into 3 sessions, with pauses in the middle. Session one was about how games change stories. Session two was about how to make stories playable. The last one was about how to use the storytelling toolbox. The tools all writers have and also the tools that belong only to game writers.

The workshop was packed with practical insight and exercises to train for the next days. In Fall 2022, a company I worked for paid for my fee at the narrative department workshop. This gave me access to a series of interesting workshops at a special price. I am thankful for that.