Skip to content

Tag: ideas

Systems in symphony

A game is a form of entertainment. Entertainment is fun. Fun is survival. Even though you don’t need to hunt anymore, you still have this kind of instinct that you feel you’d like to improve. A video game allows you to train it without risk. Other forms of entertainment are not interactive, so you aren’t training. But still, you are learning.

When I design a game, the first question is this: For which instincts do I want to prepare a journey to train them? Creating video games means creating fictitious problems. Very often we confuse game design with general design: solving problems for people. Game design solves the need for entertainment but creates problems to do that!

Once the instincts are clear, a series of systems can form the path to their training. It’s like composing a piece of music, you have all the instrumental lines and have to make them act in a symphony.

There has been a lot of talk about “game economies” that pervaded discussions on systems design, but I think of “game symphonies”. Also because certain games do have an economy. Game economists think about the distribution and conversion of virtual resources. Which is vital for certain services to be profitable.

Game designers, instead, are more centered on rhythm, melody, and harmony of systems.

My take on Supercell’s CEO last post

Last week I read interesting thoughts about the latest message released by Supercell CEO Ilkka Paananen. This is an annual event that always attracts a lot of attention. It is interesting to watch how the experts’ thinking and the media attention evolve.

Supercell proves to be a company that is as ethical as Nintendo and others. They are the good people in our industry and they should always be respected for this reason alone. I have never worked with them, so I don’t know how they work internally. But the fact that they promote certain values ​​and ways of communicating is enough for me to keep them in my heart.

Every expert has denounced the lack of information this time, and this year I also felt a great lack. The challenges described are due to the fact that the power has shifted from publishers to platforms. Everything else for me is a consequence of this. Especially in the case of companies like Supercell that do their job well.

What I don’t understand is why in 2025 I still can’t play Brawl Stars on my PS5 and my home PC. Why can’t I download it from Steam and the Microsoft Store?

Supercell is leaving money on the table in this sense.

Stories come from consciousness

A guy that I follow on LinkedIn said: “TikTok is already testing TV-like series with 90-second episodes, some titles generating hundreds of thousands of views behind modest paywalls ($5.13 for 10 episodes). Instagram creators are building millions of followers through episodic Reels, while YouTube embraces serialized content on YouTube TV.”

I understand the interest that an AI-generated story can generate.

hey look at what this new technology is capable of doing!

In this sense, I understand why there is so much engagement. There is something new and people want to see what it is. There is a long way to go from here to thinking this is the future. The “future” arrives organically, and it is difficult to predict. I work every single day with creativity and storytelling. Like everyone else, I am using tools that promise greater productivity. I am noticing improvements, especially in “unlocking” my mind in certain tasks.

Example: new task, with a poorly defined problem. I send a prompt to Claude, who gives me a wrong and summary answer. I start mentally criticizing the answer, and this makes me think on the right track.

But there is a long way to go from here to thinking that I can create stories that keep people engaged for a long time. These stories come from consciousness. Consciousness is impossible to reproduce in electrical signals because it does not come from there. It comes from something above us.

But that’s my belief.

I need new metaphors for teaching

The other day I was talking to friends about my teaching experience. This semester I accompanied some students in their “TFG, Trabajo de Final de Grado”. Their thesis, in short. University has changed a lot in recent years, for a whole series of factors. Society has changed since the time I went to university.

We were talking about the most difficult thing about teaching nowadays. I teach game design and development. For me the most difficult thing is actually teaching!

I am a learning facilitator for those who want to learn, rather than someone who actually teaches. Maybe it’s a question of age and experience.

Today the challenge is adapting to a world where information (and teachings) arrive at all hours from many sources that have pervaded our lives.

I can no longer see the story of the master to follow as possible in this world. I am not a person who goes to the mountain to wait for the worthy disciple to climb it and reach the source. For the type of culture (Christian) I come from, I prefer to be a shepherd and be among the sheep.

But this metaphor must change. Sheeps today have a Pandora’s box between their paws, designed to throw everything into their digestive tracts.

On setting the right expectations

Yesterday I was arguing with a LinkedIn influencer about the expectations that EA had on Dragon Age: The Veilguard. His point was that the game had 1.5M players instead than 3M expected by EA. So the game was lacking appeal for the players.

My point, instead, was that a game that reaches that impressive number (in only 2 months) is definitely an appealing game. Then the game can be good or bad. But for sure it has appeal. The expectations set up by EA execs, instead, were out of reality. The error was theirs, not developers mistake.

He told me that the budget invested in marketing was enormous (no data added) so that the game should have had more players. Plus, the fact of having players doesn’t mean that every player bought the game. That is true, but today if someone decides to invest part of their free time in your game is a miracle. Today we have lots of distractions, it’s hard to reach Elden Ring’s numbers, just to make an example.

The problem is that today we are still setting expectations too high in a landscape with serious distribution and attention challenges. I haven’t played Dragon Age. The Veilguard (I have no time), and I read many different opinions on it. The game is a good game, and it’s appealing. But it was a deception for EA, because of their expectations on it. Those are hard times for forecasters.

Beat your limits

The majority of job offers I see out there look for people who already are in the same area. Having lateral or different experience can be beneficial in a new project, so why is that?

I don’t have the final answer, but I don’t want always the same thing. I worked a lot on mobile free-to-play and now I am working with premium PC. I am happy with that, the results will come I hope.

It’s good to be “incompetent” at something if you have the will to learn. Identify the systems, engage with the players of that kind of games, discover your own limits. And overcome them.

I believe in game education

A question that I receive a lot is: “do I need to study game development at a University, if I want to become a game developer?”

And my answer is: no, you don’t need to.

Often, there is a follow up question: “do you believe in game education?”

And my answer is: yes, I do.

It may look contradictory, but there is a sense in it. Nowadays, the access to the information useful to get the right education is very wide. Speaking of game development, you can choose to educate in game development:

  1. because it’s a beautiful craft. You will grow as a person like when you study music, literature, math, and other fields
  2. it’s good to understand how something so pervasive as games work to live better
  3. having teachers explaining us the art of game design and development makes us connect with our inner kid.

Those are just three reasons, but there are many more.

Walking the walk

I haven’t played Indiana Jones for a while and now I feel that I don’t know where I was, anymore. Probably I will quit this game without completing, which is sad because I like it a lot.

As far as I know, very few people complete single player games. You put lots of effort in making a complete experience and only a minority of the few people in the World that played it enjoy it fully. It’s part of the deal with creativity.

Another deal is that a project can fail, no matter if you have enough experience to run it or not. You can be a true expert and still make something that people don’t want. The other day I was watching a live playtesting of an MMO game made by ex-BigCorporate people with no funds. They were asking to support their patreon and stuff like that.

I thought: “guys, are you crazy or something? Put yourselves in this hard project with no money”.

But everyone has a story, they live their and I live mine right?

Good news for the ecosystem

Today’s news is that ex-Annapurna staff is acquiring the Private Division team. This means that Annapurna Interactive (the official one) will continue make “transmedia” things with contractors. Meanwhile, Take Two interactive will focus on live service PC and mobile games.

Win win for everyone. I hope this newly formed team do great things. Especially, I wish they start from small things. I have said this many times, I will repeat it: to me the games industry is like a forest.

And a forest to be healthy needs not only big trees. It needs also the underwood, the little mushrooms. The ants working everyday, the snakes representing a danger. Over the last 5-10 years the expectations from investments and media were just looking at the big trees like Roblox and Fortnite. But for Roblox and Epic to survive, a healthy ecosystem needs also small games. AA games, indie games, instant games. Small games.

I like to write and design all by myself

I am noticing a trend against LLM platforms, coming from people that enjoy writing, like me. On the other side, enthusiasts explain how the performance improved thanks to these services.

It seems to me a case of beauty and intuition versus rationality and data. And this is something deeper than one can think at a first glance. Over the last decades the discourse around productivity and success got a huge boost. AI fits in this because it helps people build a storytelling that may feel credible with a quick read. And if you are not a creative person, this is a wonder.

There are consequences, on multiple levels. Internet today is a different place than 5 years ago, and I believe this is not right or wrong. It is what it is. I watch or listen anything and first thought is “let me check this has not been auto-generated”. Sometimes I fall in the trap, too.

Will AI boost “productivity”? Well, does it really matter at this point?