Hello and thank you for reading my blog. As you may have noticed, I wasn’t posting every day in the last 2 weeks. That is because I am closing my year and going off to vacations with my family.
I will return to post regularly on August, approximately. I need to enjoy a full disconnection and stay 100% with people I love. I need to read books and stay away from screens. My year was intense, full of work so I deserve that.
Have a great July and see you soon!
As a freelancer I work with many realities, but never AAA games. I work mostly with indies and free-to-play companies. I had some blockchain gigs, too. They paid very well even if the business was confusing, to say the least.
A significant difference between free-to-play companies and indies is their definition of success.
F2P CEOs are looking to solve a formula: CAC < LTV. Customer Acquisition Cost less than LifeTime Value. Indie founders, instead, want to be able to make another game. Everyone would like to become rich of course.
On one side we have people thinking of something scalable, on the other teams who want to continue making games. They both can learn a lot from each other.
“The tune had been haunting London for weeks past. It was one of countless similar songs published for the benefit of the proles by a sub-section of the Music Department. The words of these songs were composed without any human intervention whatever on an instrument known as a versificator. But the woman sang so tunefully as to turn the dreadful rubbish into an almost pleasant sound.” (G. Orwell, 1984)
Videogames, like music, are perceived by some people working or investing in them as “content”. That’s where the very concept of creativity starts to be corrupted up to a level that is hard to answer quickly to some issue.
Creativity to me has more to do with removing things than adding. It’s like you throw the clay, or something like that, and then you start to dig material away from it.
Everyone who worked with me can confirm this, I start very ambitious and then I work shoulder by shoulder with engineers and artists to remove stuff. It’s better to have 1 thing well polished than 5 generic. It’s better to enhance a strong part of a game than to create a new mode to sustain the weakest ones.
The dopamine culture wants content, and it’s harder to see this simple truth.
What I really liked to see yesterday at Microsoft’s XBOX Showcase 2024 was the presentation of the new Call of Duty.
I am never been a COD fan, and I have never played that game too much. But I liked the developers’ interview explaining how they changed a single thing, the fantasy, to innovate meaningfully on the whole game.
The new fantasy of the “action man” led to a whole new set of features and animations. Some of them is designed for new audiences who, like me, are not experts playing that game. Refreshing!
Impressive and you can see how the game design is definitely a role shared among the whole team.
I just discovered that yesterday was the World Tetris Day. The history of Tetris is incredible, they made movies and documentaries on that.
I like to hear stories about game design as an invention. Most of the time we work with projects, not inventions. Inventions in creativity have the potential to create nostalgia.
I like vision statements like “games that will be remembered forever”. They mean to work to develop a market, not just saturate it to extract profit.
The day after World Tetris Day I wish you to invent something new.
Have a great weekend everybody!
One thing games and stories have in common is that, for some weird reason we love when they talk about work.
We love stories of lawyers and we love power-wash simulators. A friend of mine bought a freakin’ airplane cabin for his garden and teaches maneuvers to newbies every night on Il-2 Sturmovik: Battle of Stalingrad.
We also love games with less fidelity, still on work-related stuff. Nintendogs had a tremendous success, for instance. Some DS owner just got that game and that’s it.
One of the best moments of What Remains of Edith Finch (the most memorable, to me) happens while you are cutting and cleaning fish.
These games can tell stories that we relate to deeply, and give us a different sort of escapism.
When we are kids, many of us play actual professions. I was an astronomer, I bought zines and everything: a true expert! I spent my afternoons with maps, numbers, and theories I didn’t understand.
When a game is bad or “grindy” for us we often say “I feel like I am working”, but the working fantasy has a huge narrative potential.
Games and novels can turn mundane experiences into ones that pull on our psychology of reward faster than the real world. There are sparkles, rewards, sounds, and bouncing numbers.
The working metaphor can be easily related to reality, we can feel productive in terms of that particular fantasy. A well-thought work fantasy can also intrinsically motivate players who like to feel productive and valued.
Game design uses technology to create entertainment. Entertainment is one of the words that have been corrupted in certain contexts.
In the dopamine culture, the dream of many is to attract the attention of the “users” and trap them forever. Entertainment is read as a synonym of “holding”, which is semantically correct.
Entertainment to me has much more in common with hospitality, instead. The act of being friendly and welcoming to guests and visitors.
Also in the Bible, we can read different translations (Hebrews 13:2):
Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.
King James Version
Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.
English Standard Version
It’s your call: entertainment as trapping the people’s attention versus entertainment as showing hospitality.
Are you holding or are you hosting?
Mine is always the latter, I create entertainment for human beings (and maybe angels, who know?), not monkeys.
Squad Busters is a great toy, for me. I noticed this is a game led by game designers. I guess that they want to prove the long tail of this concept. And I hope they will because they are making something they like.
I bet that this game has passed the first very important test of any successful game. This is NOT the D1 retention that can be calculated in at least 4 different ways to trick stakeholders.
I call this test “voluntary play”: if the team is playing the game for pure pleasure, you have a promising game.
Only 5% of games pass this test. If more people would make this test we would have fewer meaningless games in the stores. We prefer to keep working on something uninteresting because “we should check CPI”, or “Let’s see D3“.
My question is: why should the people play that crap if you won’t?
Squad Busters has a strong hook, for sure. If its tail is high enough, building the mid-experience on vertical progress should be easier than following the old playbook. And if it doesn’t work, it’s still a game related to their brand. They could also try to expand to more platforms.
I would play this on Steam, for example.
And for mobile, I would add a new control system for people like me who prefer to swipe. A system based on giving directions to the squad by swiping on the screen. With points of interest for them to act with elements in the range.